Israeli Independence Day →
Infosecurity.US wishes to extend our hearty best wishes to the State of Israel on the occasion of their sixty-ninth Independence Day!
The Porter
MEDITERRANEAN SEA (April 7, 2017) The guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) conducts strike operations while in the Mediterranean Sea, April 7, 2017.
Porter, forward-deployed to Rota, Spain, is conducting naval operations in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Ford Williams/Released)
Lisa Wiswell, The Story of the Pentagon's Bureaucracy Hacker →
Behold, the story of Lisa Wiswell, currently Chief of Digital Security [aka Bureaucracy Hacker at the Defense Digital Service organization see here] for the DoD's Defense Digital Service and originator of the Pentagon's Bug Bounty program. Penned by Anna Mulrine Grobe, staff writer practicing her craft at the Christian Science Monitor's Passcode security focused blog; and Deemed this week's MustRead. Note, there is much more of interest with this effort, visible here.
Julian's Grounded
Ecuador's moves imply an effort to protect relations with the United States of America, in their termination of Assanges' internet access, citing attempts to influence elections. Certainly a prudent choice.
President Theodore Roosevelt's Independence Day Speech, 1903
In which, Theodore Roosevelt , President of the United States, delivers his 1903 Independence Day Oration.
Mr. Chairman, and you, my fellow citizens, my old time friends and neighbors, men and women of Huntington:
I thank you for having given me the chance of saying a few words to you this afternoon, and in greeting all of you I wish to say a word of special greeting to those whom none of us will object to my greeting. First, to the men because of whom we have to-day a country and a President—and to the men of the National Guard, wearing the uniform I have worn myself, for having come out to serve as my escort to-day.
And, now, men and women, in speaking to you to-day, I want not only to join with you in an expression of thankfulness for the nation’s mighty past, but to join with you in expressing the resolution that we of to-day will strive in our deeds to rise level to those deeds which in the past made up the nation’s greatness. Each generation so far, in this country, has been blessed, first, with the chance to resolve, and to put into effect the resolution so as to conduct itself that the next generation in turn would have the opportunity to feel a like gratitude. It is a good thing, on the Fourth of July and on all other occasions of national thanksgiving, for us to come together, and we have the right to express our pride in what our forefathers did, and our joy in the abundant greatness of this people.
We have the right to express those feelings, but we must not treat greatness achieved in the past as an excuse for our failing to do decent work in the present, instead of a spur to make us strive in our turn to do the work that lies right at hand. If we so treat it we show ourselves unworthy to come here and celebrate the historic past of the nation. In 1861, when Lincoln called to arms you men of the great war, how did you show your loyalty to the men of 1776, to the spirit of ’76? You showed it by the way in which your hearts leaped to the performance of the task that was ready in those days.
You people here in Huntington showed it by the way in which your young men went to the front. You showed that the spirit of Nathan Hale still lived in America. No amount of talking of what had been done in the Revolution would have availed anything if you had not had it in you to add to these great memories by the deeds which were to make, in their turn, forever memorable the years between the firing of Fort Sumter and Appomattox. So we come here together on the Fourth of July to see what a great people we are; to see how well the generations of our dead have done their duty. If we fail to realize that there is before us the obligation of handing down unimpaired to our children the courage that we have received from our fathers, then the truth is not in us.We can pay to the great men of the past the only homage really worth paying if we show by our deeds that their spirit still lives in our souls. Only by so doing can we show that we have a right to celebrate this day that marks the birth of a nation.
You, the men of 1861, you, the men of the great war, you left us more than a reunited nation; for you left to us the undying memory of the deeds by which it was kept united, and you left examples not merely for war, but examples for peace. And we can continue to keep this nation as it was and is only as we so handle ourselves in meeting the lesser tasks of to-day, as you handled yourselves in the face of the great crisis of the past. You left us the right of brotherhood and an example in what brotherhood means; not the brotherhood that is merely talked about, but the brotherhood that is acted and felt. First and foremost you left us, you most fortunate of victors, the right of brotherhood with the gallant vanquished. Wherever I go, from one end of this country to the other, I find that there is one body to which I can speak with a certainty of immediate response when I speak of the courage of the men who wore the gray, and that is the men who wore the blue. Not another war of recent times left what those terrible four years of war left this nation—the right to feel proud of each American who did his duty, as it was given to him to see his duty, whether he followed Grant or followed Lee.
Having paid the fullest tribute not merely to the valor, but to the self-devotion and steadfastness of the brother in gray, it yet remains true that the men in blue fought in the one contest which our history has seen in which success for the Union, in which success for the flag of the Republic, meant not merely greatness for this nation, but welfare for all mankind in the future. To you it was given to fight in the one contest wherein failure would have meant that all our past history was meaningless. If when Lincoln called, if when Grant came into the field, the people of this country had not rallied to uphold the statesmanship of the one and to make good the generalship of the other, the Declaration of Independence would have rung as an empty platitude, and this nation’s history would have counted only because it would have been another example in the failure of free government. The men of the great war, the veterans of 1861 and 1865, have a proprietary interest in this day that we now celebrate. For to them as much as to the men of ’76 we owe the existence of this nation as a nation.
We do not intend to let slip away from our minds the fact that everything we now have as a nation, all that we now glory in, would be non-existent if the men of ’61 had not shown in the supreme hour those qualities for the lack of which no nation and no individual can atone. You showed those qualities. Now, what qualities?
In the first place, power of disinterested loyalty to the idea, the power of being stirred to lofty emotions, of casting aside considerations of self when the welfare of the people as a whole was at stake. Patriotism first; the spirit which manifests itself in time of war, in ability to serve the flag in time of peace, ability to do a citizen’s work squarely and decently. First that spirit. Now that was not enough, no matter how patriotic a man was in 1861. If he did not have a fighting edge, his patriotism did not count. It was absolutely necessary to have patriotism, but patriotism was of no use if the man ran away.
Exactly. Now so it is in the ordinary workaday tasks of citizenship at the present day. If the man is not decent, in the first place, then he is not merely useless to the community but a menace to it. In time of war, if the man did not have in him the power of loyalty to the flag, loyalty to the nation, loyalty to his regiment, the more dangerous he was. He had to have that quality first of all. In civil life we need decency, honesty and the spirit that makes the man a good husband, a good father, a good neighbor and a good man to work alongside of or to deal with. That makes a man, consequently, who does his duty by the State. The worst crime against this nation which can be committed by any man is the crime of dishonesty, whether in public life, or whether in private life, and we are not to be excused as a people if we ever condone such dishonesty, no matter what other qualities it may be associated with.
Motion Picture Clip Courtesy of the Library of Congress Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mbrsmi/trmp.4092
Meta:
Title
Pres. Roosevelt's Fourth of July oration /
Other Title
President Roosevelt's Fourth of July oration
President Roosevelt's 4th of July oration
Pres. Roosevelt's 4th of July oration
Summary
President Theodore Roosevelt eats and then speaks to a crowd who have gathered to hear him. From another camera position, the crowd bids him farewell as Roosevelt and his party enter a horse-drawn carriage and leave the vicinity.
Contributor Names
Bitzer, G. W., 1872-1944, camera.
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919.
American Mutoscope and Biograph Company.
Paper Print Collection (Library of Congress)
Created / Published
United States : American Mutoscope and Biograph Company : Kleine Optical Co., 1903.
Subject Headings
- Fourth of July orations
Genre
Short films
Nonfiction films
Actualities (Motion pictures)
Notes - H33456 U.S. Copyright Office
- Copyright: American Mutoscope & Biograph Co.; 15July1903; H33456.
- Camera, G.W. Bitzer.
- Appearing: Theodore Roosevelt.
- Duration: 2:53 at 16 fps.
- Materials listed originate from the paper print chosen best copy of two for digitization; for other holdings on this title, contact M/B/RS reference staff.
- MAVIS 46926; Pres. Roosevelt's Fourth of July oration.
- Filmed July 4, 1903, in Huntington, Long Island, New York.
- Sources used: Copyright catalog, motion pictures, 1894-1912; Niver, K.R. Early motion pictures, 1985; American Film Institute catalog, film beginnings, 1893-1910, A.12419.
- Available also through the Library of Congress Web site as digital files.
- viewing print; Received: 1995-01-23 from LC film lab; preservation; Paper Print Collection.
- dupe neg; Received: 1994-12-21 from LC film lab; preservation; Paper Print Collection.
- paper pos; Received: 1903-07-15; copyright deposit; Paper Print Collection.
Medium
viewing print. 1 film reel of 1 (230 ft.) : si., b&w ; 35 mm.
dupe neg. 1 film reel of 1 (230 ft.) : si., b&w ; 35 mm.
paper pos. 1 roll (ca. 370 ft.) : si., b&w ; 35 mm.
Call Number/Physical Location
FEC 2208 (viewing print)
FPE 7755 (dupe neg)
LC 2159 (paper pos)
Repository
Library of Congress Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA dcu
Digital Id
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mbrsmi/trmp.4092
Library of Congress Control Number
99407348
Online Format
image
video
LCCN Permalink
https://lccn.loc.gov/99407348
Library of Congress Online Catalog
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=STNO&searchArg=99407348&searchType=1&recCount=10
Petard Pinch →
Edwin T. Layton, Rear Admiral, United States Navy Ribbon Bar
Intelligence QOTD, Edwin Layton, RADM, USN →
'I want you to be the Admiral Nagumo of my staff. I want your every thought, every instinct as you believe Admiral Nagumo might have them. You are to see the war, their operations, their aims, from the Japanese viewpoint and keep me advised what you are thinking about, what you are doing, and what purpose, what strategy, motivates your operations. If you can do this, you will give me the kind of information needed to win this war.' - Edwin Layton, RADM USN, 'And I Was There', 1985, pg.357, ISBN-13: 978-5550460245, Publisher - Random House (March 1987)
Brought to my undeniably over-taxed attention by the Red Team Journal
Refugees, The Commandment
Andy Ihnatko's take:
"We are commanded to accept refugees. That’s the entire argument. When people are fleeing a war zone, and escaping from a force that quite simply wishes to eradicate them as if scrubbing out a stain, it doesn’t even matter that the situation is so dire that these people must be referred to as “…surviving members of a family.”
The scale of the crisis is immaterial. People are fleeing the homeland that their families have known for several generations, carrying only what they were able to gather up in the two minutes they had before they fled. We are commanded to accept them. The order comes from the highest possible authority: our humanity.
The US has often refused safe haven to entire populations escaping — let’s be clear and efficient here — “near-certain death.” Have historians ever examined those decisions decades later, with the benefit of perspective and data that were unavailable to people at the time, and declared “Yup. That was totally the right call”?
I bet the answer’s “No.”
This is easy and obvious. I’m certain that you agree with me.
And if you encounter someone who thinks otherwise…help them out. Ask them if they’re religious. If they are, tell them to open up the drawer in the nightstand next to their bed and take out whatever leatherbound book they find in there. They should keep flipping through it until they find the page where it says “You are commanded to help innocent people who are fleeing near-certain death. Not despite the fact that they’re strangers to you, and there’s no benefit to doing so, and doing so might be very hard. You must do it because of those things.”
If they get frustrated after the first few minutes and begin to protest, calm them down and encourage them to keep right on looking because it’s definitely in there somewhere."